I think there's something to this...

From Gaius Publius here. [Quoted in full below.]

Galbraith on Obama: For the rest of his life, the eyes of the old, the poor, the jobless, whose hopes he once raised, will follow him everywhere

This analysis of the current situation is strongly critical, to be sure, but also wonderfully well written. You can click to get the full point; it's along these lines (h/t reader MG1 via email):

The President is not a progressive – he is not what Americans still call a “liberal.” He is a willful player in an epic drama of faux-politics, an operative for the money power, whose job is to neutralize the left with fear and distraction and then to pivot rightward and deliver a conservative result ... a long-term lock-in of domestic spending cuts, and a path toward severe cuts in the core New Deal and Great Society insurance programs – Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. And, of course, no tax increases at all.

This is Professor James Galbraith, so the details are well mustered. "What Barack Obama got from the debt deal was exactly what his sponsors have wanted" — and he explains in full. There's a lot in this essay, and it's worth a full read.

But I want to leave you with his exceptional ending.

I think it's under-estimated how much it matters to men like Obama that they get their families to the next level of society — how much it matters that they enter the aristocratic elite and bring their children with them.

Think of Bill Clinton — he comes from a back-water town, and through really hard work (and exceptional talent) gets his daughter into Sidwell Friends School, where the elite are prepared to be the elite. Next thing he knows, she marries well and works at a big-time hedge fund and venture capitalism shop. The family is secure; they'll be yachting with princes (so to speak) for a long time to come.

Obama's on that path, at least as far as the Sidwell Friends School part is concerned. And he certainly loves his family.

But will he be loved himself in his retirement? Certainly the black community will consider him a saint, for obvious (and good) reasons.

But liberals? Progressives? Anyone with half a mind who knows what an FDR-opportunity, in a world-historical JFK-moment, was thrown away? Will the youth who were shagged in 2008 ever vote again in such numbers, with such enthusiasm and (yes) hopefulness? What about the ex-middle class, fallen from grace without a (safety) net?

Here's Galbraith on Obama's post-presidential future:

[O]ur presidencies are short. The professors who joined Obama for his opening act have already gone home. The advisers who remain face dreary futures in think-tanks funded by the likes of Michael Milken, our premier financial ex-felon.

Maybe, if they are especially loyal to their true masters, then like the former budget director Peter Orszag they can go to work for a bank. This surely accounts in part for their present actions.

And the President too is a young man. Unlike say Lyndon B. Johnson or Jimmy Carter, when his term ends he won't be able simply to go home. He'll need a big house in a gated suburb, with high walls and rich friends. And a good income, too, from book deals and lecture fees. He may be thinking about that now. ... [But] it won't save him. For if and when he ventures out, for the rest of his life, the eyes of all those, whose hopes he once raised will follow him. The old, the poor, the jobless, the homeless: their eyes will follow him wherever he goes.

Amen, brother.

GP